The secret history of George Bush

The position of President of the United States of America is one of the most high profile, and highly scrutinised role in the World. Think back to the media hype surrounding the Barack Obama election campaign and the investigation into his family history, his birth, his background. Every aspect of his birth and life was scrutinised from supposed links to Islam, to possible birth outside the US. There is no doubt that the personal life of any Presidential candidate will be subjected to this sort of scrutiny, but there is one interesting difference which is the reason for considering Obama and comparing his treatment by the press with, just for arguments sake, his predecessor George W. Bush, and perhaps more importantly his father George H. W. Bush. The Bush family are considered an establishment upper class American success story with a strong history in finance, the oil industry and the armaments industry. In the run up to the election of George the elder there was certainly media interest in the role of his predecessor Preston Bush and his work as a financier to Nazi German in the run up to and during the Second World War, but what was less closely scrutinised was the suggestion that George H. W. Bush may not be a Bush at all.

There is evidence that the truth is one of the strangest stories in politics, and reads like a classic spy novel, but bear with it. As the second World War developed and the allies began to establish greater strength and senior figures within the Nazi party began to question the strategic decisions of Adolf Hitler and the progress of the War plans were put in place to ensure that key military, scientific and financial figures could ensure their safety. This is a tactic that has a long established history. Often the figures behind the power throughout mediaeval Europe would back both sides in a conflict to ensure their personal success and it was in this tradition that the German power brokers operated. Many had already established links with the United States in the inter war years and one of the most established was the scientist Nicola Tesla who had worked for Thomas Edisons company and had established himself with several leading US financially powerful families, eventually moving to America and taking dual Serbian and American nationality. Tesla is key to this story since he employed as his assistant and accountant one George H Schreff, a German national who emigrated to the States with Tesla, bringing his son George H. Schreff jnr.

Tesla repeatedly raised concerns over his assistants young son and the way he would examine Teslas experiments and notebooks, and it appears likely that the Schreffs had been attached to Tesla at the request of senior figures in Nazi Germany to monitor Teslas work and report back. Where this all gets far more interesting is that there is no clear evidence of accurate death certificates of either Schreff senior or junior, and that Schreff senior as well as working for Tesla was also employed by the Union Sulphur company, a company funded and partially owned by the Rockefeller family interests. The Rockefeller family was closely linked to several other European banking families including the Sachs banking institution of Goldman Sachs fame and the Warburg bankers of Germany. Through these links there was a connection to the family of Samuel Prescott Bush and his banking partner Thomas Walker. Returning to the need to develop a plan to escape the collapse of Nazi Germany there was a systematic expunging of family records of senior Nazi party officials and the creation of new identities, often within establishment families that were considered to be above suspicion. This was a process that was begun as early as 1920 as the inevitability of a second European War became apparent and plans began to be laid. So it was the George Shreff senior became Prescott Bush under this scheme, later to repay his debt by using his families bank to fund the Nazi party, and his son became George H. W. Bush, eventually the 41^st President of the United States.

Makes questions over Obamas family history and place of birth seems slightly irrelevant really.

The real global power structure

In order to understand the way in which the World is controlled it is essential to analyse the position and purpose of each component within the organisational structure. The biggest issue in doing this is the sheer volume of disinformation and secrecy around the structure specifically designed to hide the true story. To pierce this veil of secrecy it is necessary to go back into prehistory and the dawn of civilisation, and to understand that the history we are taught, the history that we have evidence for from archaeology and anthropology are a part of the smokescreen, and therefore needs to be reassessed. Officially human development began in earnest some 400,000 years ago with an evolutionary shift amongst early hominids to create a new strain, modern man. During this period there was territorial crossover and competition between at least four species of hominid, namely Neanderthal, modern human, late Australopithecus and Indus. Each strain had its niche and was able to co-exist, and did so until approximately 15,000 years ago when modern man made the jump from hunter gatherer to farmer, allowing for a more settled existence and the development of civilisation. From a point before this, the competing hominids has gradually lost ground and been surplanted.

It is pretty clear that this is by no means a complete story, and doesn't even explain the evidence that is in the public domain, particularly the evidence for travel amongst early human societies, the colonisation of Australia and South America 60,000 years ago being perhaps the best known, and the discovery of 40,000 year old palaeolithic tools of a European style in North America. The truth is rather stranger than this story would suggest. Taking into account the petroglyph evidence globally, and the unreported discoveries of earlier settled agrarian societies across China, India and Central Africa and South America it becomes clear the at a point approximately 50,000 years ago something happened to the hunter gatherer modern human to cause a significant technology jump. This event was the arrival of an extra terrestrial race of advanced beings who selected and genetically modified early humans and provided advanced tools and technology allowing the removal of the three non-assisted species listed earlier. The purpose of this intervention was to create a technological but subservient race and to prepare the way for a takeover of the planet at some undefined future point.

This extra-terrestrial race arrived in a craft created from a planetoid, as has been discussed in a previous article, giving rise to the Sumerian and East Indian creation stories, this craft utilising hyperspace tunnelling to cross interstellar space. In order to keep this information secret and to control human development correctly to bring this plan to pass it was considered necessary to establish a ruling elite to guide and manage development, and to prepare the planet and population for later integration into the stellar Empire. The core of this elite is a group of extra-terrestrials left behind as caretakers. Having a life expectancy far beyond humans, in the order of tens of thousands of years it was clear that this groups would be unable to directly interact with humanity and would need to remain hidden. To this end a base was established in the Antarctic, concealed below two miles of ice sheet, and a network of human intermediaries was established. These intermediaries were a group of twelve families, the secrecy being secured by blood bonds, these having been built into the genetic modification previously carried out and enhanced by the creation of myths, version of which are found in Greek, Roman and Viking cultures, blood ties being of considerably greater importance than any other.

These twelve ruling families set up the next level of control, secret societies based around key technological advances, the craft guilds which have a far longer history than is generally accepted. These guilds protect their own secrets based on the principle of commercial advantage, again a concept that was designed in the humans at a genetic level, and each guild protects the link to the ruling families by ensuring that no more than three members at any time are aware of the link. The secrecy of the link between the ruling families and the true masters is protected by ensuring that the guild leaders are unaware of the link, so even if the secrecy of one guild is broken it appears nothing more than a commercial organisation with no deeper ulterior motive. The guilds operate to orders established by the ruling families, and each guild controls a network of sub-groups which form the controlling interests behind global corporations and political groups. The implication of this is that the groups that appear to be our leaders, politicians and business interests are actually four steps down the chain of command from the true masters, who are themselves merely caretakers for yet higher powers.

Each level of this structure will be analysed in greater detail over a series of coming articles, and will demonstrate that the history we know is nothing more than a fairy story to keep us from understanding our real purpose.

Further evidence of the coming banking collapse

Following on from my earlier post on the inevitability of a second banking crisis this weekend is seeing a very unusual situation at the three banks that make up the Natwest banking group. It appears that a computer glitch has caused widespread disruption to peoples accounts with deposits and withdrawals not being registered correctly and people unable to make withdrawals from cashpoints. Bank branches are being opened over the weekend to help, but the timing suggests that something more is going on. If we start from an understanding that there are still major problems in the banking system, something that is generally accepted with bank ratings being downgraded and the Euro still in crisis then the possibility exists that there may be a rather more serious story behind this issue. The first thing to note is that whilst any computer system is vulnerable to technical difficulties, the computer systems used in banking are very highly regulated and are subject to continuous monitoring and checking. This is a legal requirement, and is actioned by the financial services authority (FSA) and the Bank of England (BoE) in the UK. Consequently it is unlikely that this is a simple error, or that it would cause this level of disruption if there wasn't something more behind it.

What could that be? Well, what if a decision was taken that large scale bank failures were an inevitability? What if the governments of the US and Europe had established that the only way out of the crisis was to let banks fail? What if they genuinely believed that there was no way to save the banks this time? Wouldn't they consider the implications of this to the public? Wouldn't they plan for public unrest and the possibility of full scale revolt? Would they perhaps try to shift the blame away from themselves as legislators and on to the banks which are going to fail anyway? If they were thinking in this way, how could that be achieved? How do you create a situation in which banks which the public have used for their entire lives, that they rely on for holding money, paying bills, providing mortgages and so on were no longer trustworthy or viable? One way would be to set up a series of events that over time reduced peoples opinions of the stability and security of banks. You could certainly imagine that if people kept having problems with banking services, with getting access to their money, there might be a move by those people to find alternative means of looking after their money themselves, you might see a steady withdrawal of money and closing of accounts rather than a panic run on the bank, until such point that the bank ran out of money.

Wouldn't this also create an opportunity for a movement that created a “new” form of banking? Something globally based perhaps? Of course, if the banking sector collapses, there is every likelihood that currencies would follow suit leaving the way clear for some kind of replacement, again perhaps on a global scale. No-one ever said that the New World Order would be established by force of arms. How much better for the elite if we, the public were placed in an engineered position that they actively chose this solution? It would certainly save a lot of effort, and leave a subservient population ready to do the bidding of their masters. It sounds like turkeys voting for Christmas to me.

Why a second banking crisis is inevitable

Looking back at the banking crisis of 2008 there are some interesting conclusions that can begin to be drawn. The official reasons for the crisis are reasonably well established, coming down to essentially bad bets by investment banks, seeking ever higher profits, and a reliance of a global property bubble that was unlikely to be sustainable. So far so good, investment banking has always been based on risk and gambling, and as any good gambler knows, you don't win all the time, if you didn't it wouldn't be a gamble. Now the argument goes that as long as property prices continued to rise, there really was no gamble, because there was always money in the pot to cover any losses so everything would always be ok. This made quite a big assumption, and one which has no basis in historical fact. There has never been an example of a price bubble being sustained indefinitely, and this is particularly the case with property. Property prices have previously occurred in the 1950's in the UK and in the 1920's and '30's in the US and across much of the Western World. There were also small collapses in Australia in the 1990's and in South East Asia in the 1970's, but for some reason there is very little mention of these events. The lack of information itself is interesting but it is far from the whole story.

It is also interesting to note that one of the key reasons for the ability of investment banks to act in these high risk ways was that there had been a shift in strategy on the part of governments to control banking operations. This was a deliberate policy of “light touch” regulation both in Europe and the US that allowed very limited monitoring of banks actions and policies with regard to risk. Officially this was to allow banks the necessary freedom to react quickly to rapidly changing financial environments, but this lie was exposed when the banks singularly failed to respond to just such a rapid change. So, what is the real reason that banks were not only allowed to act so irresponsibly, but to be supported such that they avoided the obvious consequences of their actions? The reason is surprisingly straightforward and goes back to the period in the late 1970's and early 1980's when a shift from post war austerity to consumer credit boom was used as a tool to spark economic growth in a stagnant market. As long as property prices kept going up, people felt confident and were encouraged to take on ever increasing debt in order to keep economic growth going. This was a conspiracy that encompassed governments, the media and the money lenders themselves, with the ultimate aim of creating such a level of personal debt that when the inevitable bursting of the property bubble occurred people would be helpless to support themselves forcing them into slavery to the corporations behind the markets.

So, what does this have to do with a second banking crisis. Simply that the ineptitude of the banking elite and governments and their misunderstanding of the inherent strength of the population meant that the original plan failed, creating only a partial enslavement most heavily felt amongst those with the most tenuous grip on solvency anyway, in other words the soft targets. Many of those who had a firmer grasp, those who had been more successful in the good times, those who were the real targets of the plot were not hid hard enough to control them completely. That will happen with the next collapse. This time there will be no bailout. There will be no protection for private investors, there will be no safety. Only the elite will survive intact, the remainder being consigned to servitude with the complete loss of their assets and therefore their power and even their sense of identity. This will occur in late 2013. You have been warned.

Government controls the media but who controls the Government?

Go back into history to the earliest dawning of civilisation and you see an interesting pattern emerging. To see it though you need to go back even further to the familial groups of hunter gatherers before the dawn of agriculture. In these groups you had a leader who was the strongest member of the family, the one most able to provide consistent sustenance to the family, and best able to protect the family from attack. This is a system that works well for small groups, because dissent is inefficient and waste times. It has been suggested by some anthropologists that this is the ideal community size and type for humanity, but of course that isn't possible today with the levels of overpopulation. So, we moved as a species from small groups led by a single individual, to early civilisations were large groups were ostensibly led by a single individual, most of the early civilisations being Monarchies. There is a key difference however. One strong individual can control a small group personally, can engage with every member of the group, and can manage the group well. Once you move to a larger group you find that the leader needs to have advisers, and can not know every member of the community, and their fears, wants, needs and desires. This sets up a situation that we still see today, and which brings us to the title of this article.

If a leader needs advisers and support mechanism then that leader is at the mercy to an extent of those advisers. He/she is only as well informed as the advisers allow, and therefore is no longer solely in charge. Coming up to date we see a very similar system in the modern World. Look at the politics of Western society and you see leaders, politicians who appear to be in charge but who are subject to pressure from vested corporate interests. In the US it is impossible to rise to high political office without significant financial strength, campaigning costing a tremendous amount of money. Even within the lower legislative structures politicians are often tempted by offers of support or post-office employment within corporations who demand in return, influence within the legislature. Now, you may be thinking that this is just a problem of a capitalist system where too much power is vested in a few entrepreneurial high financial worth groups, but take a look at China or Russia, still de-facto communist regimes, but here we again see powerful advisers within the regime that exert an influence on the direction of the leaders decisions.

Now, we have, certainly in the UK a rather interesting variant on this strange state of affairs. The government controls the media in the UK. It does this in two ways, firstly by funding the largest broadcaster the BBC through the license fee which is set by government, and secondly by retaining control of the various standards authorities that govern the behaviour of the media. This may not at first seem to be the case, but take a look at some of the information coming out of the current Leveson enquiry. Most of the attention has been on the purpose of the enquiry, to investigate the phone hacking and corruption allegations, but beyond this we have seen inside the way that the government, who controls the media, is in turn controlled by powerful figures in the corporate World who act for their own interests above all else. Who feed stories to the media, and who in turn fund the political parties, exerting control over all aspects of legislature. Can it be too long before even more evidence comes out bringing the true masters of this planet closer and closer to the light. But can that really be allowed to happen? Have a look at how much of the Leveson report never sees the light of day, and then decide.

The great property ownership conspiracy

For generations now we have lived with a lie. We have been told it so many times that we believed it, we built our lives around it. What lie is this? It's a big one, it is the one that tells us that we should own our own homes. That we should each own our own small piece of this Earth, that it can be ours and no-one elses, and that it has a value that can only ever go up over time. It makes an odd sort of sense perhaps. There is a finite amount of Earth, and an ever increasing population so there should be increasing demand against limited supply. Of course this assumes that economics makes any sense at all, which is not exactly a safe assumption, give that social sciences in general are not known for their accuracy, or indeed their scientific nature. There is another issue at the heart of this though. Recent events in the global economy have highlighted what many people already knew, or at least suspected. We have been living in an economic fantasy for an awfully long time. Our money is a sham, value based solely on a perception of value rather than on anything tangible or real.

The idea that has kept this fallacy going for so long is that our property is the rock that allows us to borrow against future value. As long as property prices are rising we can keep borrowing against that future value and keep consuming, generating revenue for industry, which can pay more workers more money who can spend that money on more property and more credit and so on ad infinitum. Until the system breaks down. Which it now has. The idea of owning, controlling, deriving personal wealth from a portion of our planet should be anathema. We should tread this planet lightly, not shackle it and deplete it and pollute it to satisfy our own lusts. But that is really just an aside. Given that property ownership and the consumer economy have been shown for the worthless sham that they are, the question remains, to what end was this lie propagated? Who benefits? For the answer we must turn to that favourite of conspiracies everywhere, the banking elite, and no, they haven't had enough of a kicking yet!

Follow the money. The global private banking institutions make money by lending to commercial banks, creating the illusion of money. This is passed on to consumers who spend it, creating debt, which is further funded by the private banks. When the debtors default the commercial banks take the hit and the private banks make yet more money collecting on the insurance policies that they took out in the first place. There are very few winners in this game, and they are always the same. The solution? Understand that property ownership is an illusion, open a basic checking account and close all of your other banking and savings accounts. Withdraw your money as soon as it is paid into your account. Refuse to enter into direct debit agreements, cut up your credit cards, pay off your loans and reduce your outgoings until you can live within your means. The good times are over, they never truly existed, and the austerity that our politicians talk about is not even close to the austerity that we are all about to experience. Welcome to the brave new World (order).

Reality television conspiracy

From our correspondent within a large production company :

So, you know the big reality shows, Big Brother, X Factor, Pop Idol, all that lot? Well, they weren't created by the TV companies see. They were designed and developed by a group of boffins in the US. There has been a load of research since the 1950's into controlling large populations through visual media, you know, TV, movies, video games, all of that. When it was obvious that pretty much every home was going to have at least one TV it was an opportunity to deliver targeted to huge numbers of people quickly and easily. Now, if you are a company buying advertising time, then you are overtly presenting a message and that is fine and understood, but if you are a government there are other options. There was a lot of work through the '50's and '60's into subliminal messages embedded in film and television shows. The CIA, as part of the MKULTRA experiments investigated the effectiveness of single frame flashes which were found to influence viewers without their being aware of it.

There is a lot of nonsense put out about this, the whole drink coke and eat popcorn thing at the cinema in the '50's is misinformation, the experiments showed that mind-control by subliminal messaging doesn't work that way. We now know that this is because of the way the brain is wired. It accepts sensory inputs but doesn't process them completely. The subliminal images influence the subconscious mind and tend not to interact directly with the conscious. So, the upshot of this is that although you can't directly tell people to do something, or buy something specific, you can modify more general positions. You can encourage people to eat more by indirectly influencing their appetite centres, you can discourage people from reading by influencing their emotional response centres, do you see where this is going?

Lets suppose that as a leadership elite you want to have a population that is docile, overweight, poorly educated then you can create a structure within say a popular TV show that creates a greater likelihood that this will be the case. This takes a period of time. Think back to the 1970's. Can you imagine how you would have reacted to the news that people would dedicate Saturday evenings to staying in watching a Karaoke competition? Of course not, yet that is what people are doing. The reason is that since 1974 there has been a gradual introduction of messages within programs to create a shift in the psychology of the majority of two generations. This process has been gradual with a changing message exerting more and more influence, and the process is not complete yet. The incorporation of these messages into reality TV shows is telling in itself. The format of the shows encourages audience engagement, which is part of the acceleration programme. The choice of contests is also key to deeply imprinting the messages. The long term goal is to create a society within which the elite can operate overtly, fully accepted by the lower orders who will essentially be treated as cattle, and most importantly, will accept this situation.

This is the culmination of over 300 years of development and research by the elite families and explains why certain technologies have developed and others have been allowed to fail. Why was Edison preferred over Tesla? Why Marconi? Why Baird? At each technological development that has led to the creation of todays visual media there have been competing systems. The elite have tested these competing systems and selected the one that allowed greatest progress toward the goal of complete control was selected and pushed forward. Of course the inventors were not aware of these, nor were the companies who developed the products and services, nor were the media companies who pushed certain products over others, or the majority of politicians who allowed it. Only the elite are in possession of all of the facts, and they are not about to come clean to anyone. But take a look at the chain of events and the way they are accelerating and the way that society is degenerating, and come up with a better reason or explanation.....