Does the UK weather seem strange?

The British Isles are notorious for having changeable weather, famously it is what we talk about all the time, or so I've been told, but just lately, even by our standards things have been a little odd to say the least. Back in March and April we were hit with hosepipe bans after a series of record breaking dry winters, but since April we have barely had a dry day. April, May and June have all set records for precipitation, and in early July we had a months rain in a matter of hours, not once, but twice. This seems rather hard to believe, but there is more to come. In the next two weeks we have that biggest of events, the 2012 Summer Olympic games, and we know that it is going to be the biggest shop front for GB Plc in living memory. The World will be coming to the UK, and those that can't come will be watching. Now, suppose someone had come along to the UK government and said “You know what? We can guarantee that the weather for the Olympics will be perfect, but there will be costs and implications”. Wouldn't that be a tempting idea?

We know that there have been tests over the last thirty years in controlling extreme weather events. The US National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Agency (NOAA) has carried out successful tests of cloud seeding and rain generation to modify tornadoes and hurricanes and to break droughts, and these are just the official projects and experiments. What is less well known is the weaponising on weather modification technology based around the HAARP project and its ability to heat the upper atmosphere. This is by far the most likely cause of our current sodden state since heating of the ionosphere would have the strongest impact on the jetstream, and the reason for our current conditions is that the North Atlantic jetstream has moved further South than is usual for the time of year. This has drawn cold air from the polar regions to clash with warm air rising from central Europe bringing torrential rain.

So far so good, but the implications of this are far reaching. One of the biggest claims used to debunk conspiracy theories is that governments would simply not take the risk of harming their own citizens or economy, but is this the case? There is more and more evidence that not only are governments willing to put their citizens in harms way but that this extends as far as lethality. It is now widely known that military and medical testing has been carried out both knowingly and unknowingly as have government backed false flag operations, so is it really such a step to put lives at risk in widespread flooding just to guarantee a couple of weeks of good weather? I guess it is our own fault for marketing the UK as a green and pleasant land. Well we can pretty much guarantee lush greenery everywhere with record rainfall, and it should just about be dry by the time the games start.

This could all be coincidence, but I guess that we will find out in a couple of weeks. If we have perfect weather for the Olympics maybe a few more people will start to ask questions and we might move a step closer to finding out just what exactly our political leaders are up to.