Social engineering conspiracy

From a former special advisor to the Foreign and Commonwealth office :

Throughout the 20^th Century there has been ongoing research in many countries into ways of controlling large populations both overtly, through force of arms and covertly, through techniques such as information management and psychological control. The first of these methods has been used since the earliest beginnings of humanities transition to societal and communal living, and it has been, and still is limited in its effectiveness because it relies solely on the dominant group being able to physically suppress the often numerically larger subservient group. This, as has been shown in numerous revolutions to rely on an implicit acceptance by the subservient group to be dominated. As soon as this acceptance is removed, the dominant group tends to be overthrown and replaced. It has been the desire of the dominant to achieve a state within which the overt controls are no longer required for almost as long, because control by covert means suffers less from the acceptance problem, given that it can only be challenged if it has been revealed.

The earliest, and still most common form of covert control is religion. There is often debate amongst theologians and students of comparative religion regarding the similarities between geographically disparate belief systems, and the explanation often presented is that many belief systems developed from a single root source and were modified as groups of early civilisations became more diverse and faced more varied challenges, but the remnants of the original beliefs was retained to a greater or lesser extent in stories such as creation myths, global floods, stories of giants and so on. This is unlikely to be the case given the number of assumptions that it relies upon, principle amongst these being the assumption that there is a core of truth to these beliefs which has lent them strength to retain their broad shape over multiple thousands of years. In reality the story is rather different, and relies on no assumptions other than the idea that in any society there is a need to control a large proportion of the population, if one regards this as an assumption rather than a simple statement of fact.

Using this need for control as a start point it becomes clear that religion is a potentially powerful tool of control if it is harnessed in the right way. People are instinctively ware of their own mortality and are habitually wary of situations of uncertain safety. As a consequence an idea that offers security, and also offers the hope that death is not the end has a tremendous appeal. If you analyse the similarities between World religion you see that they tend to relate to highly uncertain and highly dangerous situations. Examples are cataclysms, floods, fires, earthquakes, monsters, demons and so on. The point of similarity is that these disasters are caused by behaviours that tend towards individual freedom rather than group thinking. One of the best examples is that most religions proscribe sexual freedom, and most commonly homosexuality. Sexual freedom is common amongst almost all higher mammals, with the caveat that sexual freedom is repressed whilst raising offspring, but returns once offspring are grown. Sexual diversity encourages genetic drift and increases hybrid vigour within a species. Homosexuality plays a role in this, sexual activity both homo and hetero sexual encouraging cooperation between individuals, strengthening communities.

The proscription of sexual practices is key to understanding the way in which social control works since the principle is to curtail individual freedom by making certain natural behaviours unacceptable thereby creating mental disharmony and lack of balance. Once an individual is challenged in this way they become easier to control, and the more freedoms you proscribe, the easier the control becomes. That is the history, and it has been highly effective. The 20^th Century has seen a step change in the use of covert control techniques. Technology development has increased the ability to disseminate information on a scale that has not been possible before. Alongside this, the understanding of the details of the way in which the brain works has developed. It is interesting to note that many religions are wary of psychology, and more specifically psychotropic drugs. The reason for this is again clear. Psychology presents an opportunity for a shift in those who have power away from religious leaders and towards governments. It is worth noting that the rise of technology and understanding has occurred alongside a decline in religious belief, but that there has been no concomitant shift in individual freedoms. The bulk of the population is still just as controlled but in a different way and by a different group.

The aim is to reach a point that there is a fully two tier global population, a small global elite serviced by and provided for by a vast slave population. The 1% is only the start......