There
are some strange gaps in our knowledge of ancient history,
particularly around the construction of some of the Worlds most
iconic structures. Across the globe there are monumental buildings
created from immense blocks of stone, often moved great distances by
our ancestors using the most basic tools. Now it is true that in some
cases we have written evidence from primary sources about the way in
which these structures were created, but it is interesting to note
that there are often conflicting reports or sections of description
missing. As an example we have texts from ancient Egypt describing
the quarrying of the stone blocks used for pyramids and temples, we
have examples of the tools used and we know how blocks were moved
within the quarry, but on the subject of how the blocks were moved to
site, and how they were integrated into the structure and perhaps
most importantly, how and why the structures were positioned as they
were. Given the importance the Egyptian society placed on record
keeping this seems rather odd. Then there are the stories of the
construction of the both the Tower of Babel and the Gardens of
Babylon. Again the Mesopotamian peoples were renowned for keep
meticulous notes, and there are hundreds of thousands of clay tablets
detailing every aspect of daily life, yet on the subject of these
epic building projects which must have taken many years and many
thousands of workers the tablets refer to myth and legend.
The
same is true of the reports of the construction of the Temple of
Solomon with stories of the great and wise King employing demons
controlled by a magical ring. So we have missing evidence where we
should have complete reports, but more than that we have some strange
situations when it comes to reports of the designers and architects
of antiquity. The best example is from Egypt again, where we see the
same name cropping up over and over again across vast periods of
time. This suggests that either our sense of chronology is badly
wrong, or that the name Imhotep is a title of office rather than an
individuals name, or that there is something more unusual going on.
There have been many suggestions that the possibility of intervention
by a more advanced race, possible extra terrestrial in origin exists.
Certainly there is at least circumstantial evidence of the use of
technology that we believe was not available during these periods, as
seen in the metalwork reported to be found within the sloping shafts
of the Great Pyramid at Giza and in the accuracy of the positioning
of key monuments and the preparation of the initial groundworks.
So,
how is this linked to freemasonry, a movement that officially has a
history that only goes back to the 17th Century in Europe?
The secret is in the symbolism. Talking to senior Freemasons reveals
that there is a belief that the use of Egyptian and Sumerian symbols
within was created by the founders of the movement, and that the use
of Solomonic scenes during initiation refers to the concept of King
Solomon as the personification of the Great Architect, yet the story
of Hiram Abif is rather more complex and suggests a narrative lineage
directly linked through the rise of the Roman and later the Ottoman
Empire and discovered by the Crusader Knights during the 11th
and 12th Centuries and brought back to Europe. Certainly
the principles and goals of Freemasonry and the insistence on secrecy
with the movement hint at something more than a simple fraternal
society, and the links between Freemasonry, politics and the Catholic
church make you wonder exactly what secrets came back from the Holy
Land, and what exactly it was that led to so many intriguing deaths
and mysterious charges against certain religious orders. From the
Friday 13th plot to destroy the Knights Templar to the
ritual murder of Italian banker Roberto Calvi there are many examples
of a hidden history lying beneath the benign surface of this most
elusive and closeted movement.
No comments:
Post a Comment