It
appears, if the rumours are to be believed, that the Church of
Scientology, the American organisation founded by science fiction
author L. Ron Hubbard following his attempted development of a school
of psychological thought known as Dianetics is the join more
mainstream Christian religious groups in having its own TV
broadcasting facilities. As most of you will be aware, religion and
conspiracy theory are seldom happy bedfellows and I will happily
state my own position to be spiritual, non-religious, but what is
fascinating is the way in which many people, and particularly the
media view what are loosely called New Religions. Whatever the rights
and wrongs of religious belief in general, and the belief in new
religions in particular it seems that it is almost impossible to
establish a new faith without all sorts of accusations flying around
that, in large part, make little if any sense. Let us consider the
accusations that are levelled at Scientology and how these compare
with other, more established groups. It is claimed by many the
Scientology is a cult for three clear reasons. The first is that the
movement requires that a new initiate removes themselves from their
previous life. This includes contact with friends and family outside
the movement. The second is that progression within Scientology
requires spending money on resource material, books and so on, the
best estimate being that to achieve status within the movement costs
a minimum of $64,000, many members giving a proportion of their
salary to the movement. Thirdly there are reports that Scientology
uses techniques such as repetition, hypnosis, subliminal messaging,
starving and sleep deprivation to convert people.
These
are serious accusations but now let us look at one of the most
mainstream religions for comparison. Within the Catholic church there
are a number of groups who follow similar, if not more extreme
philosophies. Consider Opus Dei, the non monastic group established
globally with papal blessing. On joining Opus Dei, new members are
required to sever all ties with family and friends outside the group.
Opus Dei members live communally in group houses, sexually
segregated, and either work for free within the house or take jobs
outside the house, donating all of their earning to the house and to
Opus Dei. Techiques such as scourging or self flagellation, and the
use of the scillis or spiked wire band tied around the thigh could be
considered forms of torture, as could the sleep deprivation caused by
intense bible study and group prayer sessions. Sounds almost familiar
doesn't it? Examples of this type of religious lifestyle can be found
in Islam, Protestantism, Judaism and even Buddhism and Hinduism, so
why is Scientology singled out for criticism?
I
think it comes down to a fear of the unknown, and to an extent
Scientology has historically done itself no favours by its insistence
on secrecy over its operations, and the constant shifting believes
away from Hubbards original concepts in order to try to make
Scientology more palatable. Personally I have no more concern over
Scientology having access to production facilities than I do to
tele-evangelists having those same facilities, and I have no doubt
that just as many evangelists were caught out by the penetrating gaze
of the TV camera, philandering and committing fraud, this may turn
out to be the worst move in Scientology history to date. It will be
interesting to see just how this develops, and how it plays in
countries were Scientology has had its status as a religion removed.
No comments:
Post a Comment