There
have been several attempts of late to create a step change within the
Christian faith by implying that there have been Christian
conspiracies to deny the existence of a sacred feminine. That the
patriarchal nature of Christianity for 2000 years has somehow been
against God, and that there is an entire hidden history relating to
the female aspect of God that has been suppressed to allow the
structure of Christianity and particularly the Catholic Church to
retain its powerbase. From iconic religious paintings, to ancient
texts, to mysterious secret societies the stories go on and on, but
what is at the core of all of them is that the image of a masculine
God served by an almost exclusively male priesthood is fundamentally
in error. It is relatively easy to see why this would be an
attractive proposition, but it almost always misses one crucial
point. In order for it to make sense, or have credibility from a
Christian perspective one would have to assume that Christianity was
wrong, and therefore one would no longer be looking from a Christian
perspective.
This
may at first seem a somewhat odd thing to say, but lets look at it a
little more closely. The principles of Christianity are established
by the priesthood, guided by God. Depending on the branch of
Christianity there is a greater or lesser requirement to accept the
word of God as represented by the Holy Bible. This ranges from the
pentecostal and evangelical position that the Bible is the word of
God and as such is inviolate, to the liberal protestant position that
the Bible is a scripture of guidance and requires interpretation and
modification in line with changing societal needs. Between these is
the slightly different position of the Catholic Church wherein the
bible may be interpreted but the interpretation is at the discretion
of the Holy Father, the Pope, who is Gods representative on Earth.
This is really at the root of the opportunity seen by some writers to
adapt Christian teaching to accommodate the sacred feminine. With so
many different ways of defining as Christian there are always
conflicts over what is acceptable Christian doctrine and what is not.
What
lies at the root of these moves to raise questions about Christian
dogma is a desire to weaken the power of the Church, and to spread
dissent and discord amongst the various churches. Some of these
questions relate to simply interpretations that leave the core belief
in a single all powerful God, like questions over the acceptability
of homosexuality or contraception, but the question of the female
divine reaches to the heart of belief and questions the very nature
of God. This makes it far more challenging for the church to deal
with, particularly when the challenge comes from multiple sources.
Since the 1960's and the feminist revolution there has been pressure
for a more active role in religious practice for women, but more than
that, there has been a strong movement towards a reinvention of
female Gods. This is seen in the significant rise in popularity of
reinvented Pagan religions such as Wicca and Druidry wherein the
sacred female is celebrated as a balanced duality with the sacred
male. It has been suggested that this is the model that Christianity
should operate under, but the truth of the matter is that there is no
evidence within Christian texts that this is the case. All of the
evidence comes from outside the Christian canon and as a result is,
at best, questionable, and at worst heresy.
No comments:
Post a Comment