Despite
the way it may appear, our politicians are not well paid by the
standards of the corporate world that they legislate for. In the UK
members of parliament receive approximately £65,000 per annum in
salary with expenses to cover accommodation, travel, subsistence and
the cost of running a constituency office, along with assorted other
costs. The salary rises with seniority and number of committees the
member is assigned to. To the average UK worker on approximately
£23,000 per annum this seems an astronomical figure, but in terms of
hours of work, pressure, responsibility and commitment the job of a
member of parliament is not an average job. A closer comparison would
be to a board level position in a large corporate operation, a
position which would typically attract a stipend of closer to
£150,000 per annum with a range of bonus options. Consequently,
whatever the original motives for someone choosing to enter politics,
it will always be the case that the corporate World is able to offer
far more in terms of remuneration that politics ever can.
It
would be nice to think that this is something that can be largely
ignored by politicians, but it seems likely that this is not the case
for a couple of reasons. Firstly, in order to go into politics, to
successfully navigate the party political system, to achieve
sufficient recognition within the party machine requires a strength
of will and determination, as well as an aggression and drive that
tends only to be found in the most ambitious. Secondly, in order to
have the desire to enter politics, to deal with the loss of privacy,
the impact on family, to accept the intimate scrutiny of the media
and all of the implications of that, one would have to be extremely
highly motivated to do so, either by raw ambition for power and
position, or by some sense of purpose, some personal political
mission, some cause that creates the necessary drive. Given these
character traits it can be suggested that politicians are relatively
easy targets for experienced corporate operatives and their lobbyist
aides. Now don't get me wrong, there are all sorts of lobbyists, with
all sorts of motivations, and here I am only considering those
lobbyists funded by and representative of the corporate multinational
business world. The world where nothing matters but the profit, and
the rewards for shareholders.
The
tools of the lobbyists trade are multiple in nature. They have the
resources and backing to offer support for the politician in terms of
access to the media, to financiers, and to the corporate system that
underlies much of western life. They also offer that most precious of
commodities, support, perhaps for the politicians favourite causes,
or support in achieving political ends. The thing is that these tools
come at a cost. That cost is a reciprocal agreement with the
politician to provide the lobbyist with access to the corridors of
power. This can be in the form of granting access to senior
colleagues, giving insights into upcoming legislature and likely
voting results, raising lobbyists points and questions in parliament
all the way up to some lobbyists drafting and offering legislative
amendments to politicians to be presented as their own. The role of
the lobbyist is clear, to use whatever means necessary to gain an
advantage for their commercial clients, whilst not pushing
politicians too far towards breaking point.
It is
a delicate balancing act, but one thing is certain. Between the
ambitious character traits of politicians and the motivated position
of corporate lobbyists the one group that is least represented in a
democratic system of government is the group that at root provides
the illusion of democracy, the voting public.
No comments:
Post a Comment